
Commissioner’s Findings - PIPEDA Report of Findings #2013-017: Apple called upon to provide greater clarity on its use and disclosure of unique device identifiers for targeted advertising
The OPC investigated a complaint alleging Apple used and shared a user's unique device identifier (UDID) without knowledge or consent for tracking and targeted advertising. While Apple initially argued UDID was not personal information, the OPC found it was, especially given Apple's ability to link it to account details. The OPC determined Apple's privacy policy lacked clarity on UDID use for advertising, though its administrative uses were acceptable. Apple has since ceased using UDID for advertising, replacing it with Ad ID, and enhanced opt-out mechanisms for Ad ID, leading the OPC to find the complaint well-founded and resolved.
- Whether UDID and Ad ID constitute personal information under PIPEDA.
- Whether Apple obtained meaningful consent for the collection, use, and disclosure of UDID and Ad ID for advertising purposes.
- Adequacy of notice provided by Apple regarding its use of UDID and Ad ID.
- Apple's responsibility for disclosures of UDID and Ad ID to third-party app developers.
Complaint well-founded and resolved
Apple's practices regarding UDID and Ad ID were found to be compliant with PIPEDA due to significant changes it implemented, including improved transparency and user controls, and the phasing out of UDID for advertising.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Apple implemented enhanced privacy notices and opt-out mechanisms for device identifiers used in advertising, and ceased using UDID for these purposes.
- s. 2(1) PIPEDA
- Principle 4.3 PIPEDA
- Principle 4.3.2 PIPEDA
- Principle 4.3.5 PIPEDA
- Principle 4.3.6 PIPEDA
This summary is informational only and not legal advice.

