Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActSystemic Investigation

Access to scientists

Organization: Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans, National Research Council, Natural Resources CanadaComplainant: Environmental Law Clinic at the University of Victoria and Democracy Watch
Plain-language brief

This document describes a systemic investigation initiated by former Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault on March 27, 2013, and concluded on February 28, 2018. The investigation was prompted by a complaint from the Environmental Law Clinic at the University of Victoria and Democracy Watch. The focus of the investigation was on 'Access to scientists' within several federal institutions, including the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment Canada, Fisheries and Oceans, the National Research Council, and Natural Resources Canada. The decision type is classified as a systemic investigation, indicating a broader review of practices rather than a single access request complaint. The specific details of the findings and recommendations are not provided in this excerpt, but the investigation's scope suggests an examination of how these institutions handle information related to scientific activities and personnel.

Key issues
  1. 1Systemic investigation into 'Access to scientists' practices across multiple federal institutions
Outcome breakdownFavours: Neither
  • Systemic investigation: Investigation concluded
  • Scope of investigation: Focused on 'Access to scientists'
  • Institutions investigated: Multiple federal institutions examined
Outcome

Systemic investigation concluded

Reasoning

The provided text indicates the investigation was 'concluded' but does not specify a formal finding of well-founded or not-well-founded for a specific complaint. Systemic investigations often result in recommendations or reports rather than a binary finding on a single complaint.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.30(1)(f) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro