Federal (Canada)Access to Information Acts.6.1 Application Denied (must respond)

Decision pursuant to 6.1, 2026 OIC 61

Organization: A federal institutionComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

An institution applied to the Information Commissioner under subsection 6.1(1) of the Access to Information Act, seeking approval to decline to act on an access request. The institution argued that the request constituted an abuse of the right of access, citing two main reasons: the request's alleged purpose to obtain information not under the institution's control or another individual's personal information, and the significant burden processing the request would place on the institution. The Commissioner examined whether the request's purpose was illegitimate and whether the institution's burden assessment was adequately justified. The Commissioner found that seeking information potentially not under control or personal information does not inherently constitute an abuse of the right of access. Furthermore, the Commissioner determined that the institution's estimates for record volume and processing time were not sufficiently substantiated. Consequently, the Commissioner concluded that the institution failed to demonstrate that the access request was an abuse of the right of access, and the application was denied.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the access request constitutes an abuse of the right of access under s.6.1(1) ATIA
  2. 2Whether the request's purpose to obtain information not under the institution's control makes it an abuse of right
  3. 3Whether the request's purpose to obtain another individual's personal information makes it an abuse of right
  4. 4Whether processing the request would overburden the institution
  5. 5Whether the institution's estimate of record volume was sufficiently justified
  6. 6Whether the institution's assessment of the impact on the OPI and ATIP office was sufficiently justified
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Abuse of right: Purpose of request not abusive
  • Abuse of right: Burden not sufficiently substantiated
  • Application to decline: Application denied
Outcome

Section 6.1 application denied

Reasoning

The Commissioner found that the institution did not provide sufficient evidence to establish that the access request was an abuse of the right of access. The institution's arguments regarding the request's purpose (seeking information not under control or personal information) were not deemed inherently abusive, and its claims of overburdening were not adequately substantiated with clear and compelling evidence.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The institution's application to decline to act on the access request was denied, meaning the institution must process the request.

Statutes considered
  • s.6.1(1) ATIA
  • s.6.1(1.1) ATIA
  • s.4(2.1) ATIA
  • s.19(2) ATIA
  • s.3 Privacy Act

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (659 of 1,639), Nova Scotia (50 of 473), Quebec (10 of 7,094), Prince Edward Island (4 of 281), Yukon (2 of 76).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro