
Canadian Heritage (Re), 2026 OIC 49
The complainant alleged that Canadian Heritage failed to conduct a reasonable search for records in response to an access request for weightlifting-related communication records from two specific Sport Canada employees. Initially, the complaint also included allegations of improper withholding under s.19(1) and s.20(1)(b), but these were later withdrawn by the complainant, narrowing the investigation to the reasonable search aspect. Canadian Heritage released five pages of records but did not provide sufficient representations to the OIC regarding the keywords used, the search for call logs and text messages, or the timing of decisions on appeals. The Commissioner found that the institution's search was likely not broad enough and that it failed to demonstrate the reasonableness of its search efforts. Consequently, the complaint was found to be well founded, and Canadian Heritage was ordered to conduct a new search and provide a new response.
- 1Whether Canadian Heritage conducted a reasonable search for records
- 2Whether the scope of the search was broad enough to capture all responsive records
- 3Whether Canadian Heritage provided sufficient representations to explain its search methodology
- Adequacy of search: Search found unreasonable; new search ordered
- Complaint status: Complaint well-founded
Complaint well founded — new search and response ordered
Canadian Heritage failed to provide adequate representations to the OIC regarding the reasonableness of its search for records, including details on keywords used, search for specific communication types (call logs, text messages), and the timing of decisions. This lack of explanation led the Commissioner to conclude that the search was not reasonable.
The Minister of Canadian Heritage is ordered to conduct a new search for records, provide a new response to the complainant within 36 business days, give access to any additional records found (unless a specific provision of the Act applies), and if no additional records are found, explain how and where the search was conducted.
- s.19(1) ATIA
- s.20(1)(b) ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
- s.35(2)(b) ATIA
- s.37(1)(c) ATIA
- s.43 ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (659 of 1,639), Nova Scotia (50 of 473), Quebec (10 of 7,094), Prince Edward Island (4 of 281), Yukon (2 of 76).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro