
Canada Revenue Agency (Re), 2026 OIC 48
The complainant alleged that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) improperly withheld employee telephone numbers under paragraph 16(2)(c) of the Access to Information Act, claiming disclosure could facilitate the commission of an offence. The request was for a telephone list for the CRA Headquarters International and Large Business Directorate. The complainant also initially alleged an unreasonable search, but later withdrew this aspect of the complaint. The CRA argued that disclosing cell phone numbers, now widely used by employees, could lead to hacking, interception of communications, identity theft, fraud, and harassment, citing vulnerabilities like SS7 attacks. However, the OIC found that the CRA failed to provide clear and convincing evidence of a reasonable expectation of harm, noting that government devices are encrypted and employees are trained on security risks. The OIC also pointed out that some of the numbers were already publicly available, undermining the CRA's claim of harm. The Information Commissioner concluded that the CRA did not meet the requirements for applying paragraph 16(2)(c). The complaint was deemed well founded, and the CRA subsequently released the withheld phone numbers.
- 1Whether s.16(2)(c) ATIA (facilitating the commission of an offence) was properly applied to withhold employee telephone numbers
- 2Whether there was a reasonable expectation of harm from disclosing employee telephone numbers
- 3Whether the institution's security measures for government devices mitigated the risk of harm
- 4Whether the public availability of some employee telephone numbers undermined the claim of harm
- 5Whether the institution conducted a reasonable search for records
- Application of s. 16(2)(c): Exemption not upheld
- Disclosure of records: Records ordered disclosed
- Complaint status: Complaint well founded
Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered
The Canada Revenue Agency failed to demonstrate a reasonable expectation of harm from disclosing employee telephone numbers under s.16(2)(c) ATIA. The OIC found that the CRA's arguments regarding potential offences were speculative and did not account for the security measures in place for government devices or the fact that some similar information was already publicly available.
The Canada Revenue Agency was ordered to disclose the phone numbers withheld under paragraph 16(2)(c), which it subsequently did.
- s.16(2)(c) ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro