Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

Library and Archives Canada (Re), 2026 OIC 47

Organization: Library and Archives CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that Library and Archives Canada (LAC) improperly withheld information under section 23 (solicitor-client privilege) of the Access to Information Act. The request sought documents related to the appointment of an administrator for a Lieutenant Governor. While the Commissioner found that the information met the requirements for solicitor-client privilege, LAC's initial exercise of discretion not to release the 93-year-old record was deemed unreasonable. LAC had a policy to release such records if over 100 years old, but failed to consider other relevant factors like the content, context, and the fact that involved individuals were long deceased. During the investigation, LAC re-exercised its discretion, considering these factors, and subsequently released all the information. The complaint was found to be well-founded due to the initial unreasonable exercise of discretion, but no order was necessary as the information was ultimately disclosed.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the information met the requirements of s.23 ATIA (solicitor-client privilege)
  2. 2Whether the institution reasonably exercised its discretion not to disclose information subject to s.23 ATIA
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • Application of s. 23: Exemption upheld
  • Discretion to disclose: Initial exercise unreasonable
  • Disclosure of records: Records disclosed
  • Complaint outcome: Well-founded
Outcome

Complaint well founded — information released during investigation

Reasoning

The information met the requirements for solicitor-client privilege under s.23. However, LAC's initial exercise of discretion was unreasonable because it strictly adhered to an internal 100-year threshold for disclosure without considering other relevant factors such as the age, context, and content of the 93-year-old record, or the fact that the individuals involved were deceased. LAC subsequently re-exercised its discretion and released the information.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

Library and Archives Canada re-exercised its discretion and released the information to the complainant.

Statutes considered
  • s.23 ATIA
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro