Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

Department of Justice Canada (Re), 2026 OIC 39

Organization: Department of Justice CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that the Department of Justice Canada improperly withheld a "Final report: Mandatory Minimum Penalties. Recommendations to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. Expert Panel on Sentencing Reform" under sections 14 and 21(1)(a) of the Access to Information Act. The Department argued that disclosure would harm federal-provincial affairs and that the report constituted advice or recommendations from internal-like advisors. The Commissioner found no reasonable expectation of harm to federal-provincial affairs, noting the report was six years old, drafted by volunteers, and did not detail active negotiations or provincial positions. Furthermore, the Commissioner determined that the report was prepared by external consultants, not employees or ministerial staff, thus falling under an exception to the advice and recommendations exemption. Consequently, the Commissioner ordered the Department to disclose the records in their entirety, and the Department agreed to comply.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether s.14 ATIA (federal-provincial affairs) was properly applied to the records
  2. 2Whether disclosure of the report could reasonably be expected to harm the conduct of federal-provincial affairs
  3. 3Whether s.21(1)(a) ATIA (advice or recommendations) was properly applied to the records
  4. 4Whether the report was prepared by consultants or advisers who were not directors, officers, or employees of an institution or members of a minister's staff, as per s.21(2)(b) ATIA
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • s.14 personal privacy: Not applicable
  • s.21(1)(a) federal-provincial affairs: Exemption not upheld
  • s.21(1)(a) advice/recommendations: Exemption not upheld
  • Disclosure of records: Records ordered disclosed
Outcome

Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered

Reasoning

The Department failed to demonstrate a reasonable expectation of harm to federal-provincial affairs from disclosing the report. Additionally, the report was prepared by external volunteers, not internal staff, making the s.21(1)(a) exemption inapplicable due to the s.21(2)(b) exception.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Minister of Justice is ordered to disclose the records in their entirety.

Statutes considered
  • s.14 ATIA
  • s.21(1)(a) ATIA
  • s.21(2)(b) ATIA
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro