Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

Health Canada (Re), 2026 OIC 36

Organization: Health CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that Health Canada improperly withheld information related to a COVID-19 Vaccine Periodic Safety Update Report under sections 13(1), 19(1), 20(1)(b), and 20(1)(c) of the Access to Information Act. The Information Commissioner found that Health Canada correctly applied section 13(1) and 19(1) to some information, but failed to reasonably exercise its discretion under section 13(2) for publicly available information. The Commissioner also found that Health Canada and the third party (Pfizer) did not establish that sections 20(1)(b) or 20(1)(c) applied. Consequently, the Commissioner ordered Health Canada to disclose information not covered by sections 13(1) or 19(1), and to re-evaluate the disclosure of section 13(1) information that is publicly available. Health Canada agreed to comply with the order.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether s.13(1) ATIA applied to information obtained from the European Medical Agency (EMA)
  2. 2Whether Health Canada reasonably exercised its discretion under s.13(2) ATIA regarding publicly available information
  3. 3Whether s.19(1) ATIA applied to personal information that could identify individuals
  4. 4Whether Health Canada reasonably exercised its discretion under s.19(2) ATIA
  5. 5Whether s.20(1)(b) ATIA applied to confidential third-party financial, commercial, scientific or technical information
  6. 6Whether s.20(1)(c) ATIA applied to information that could cause financial impact or harm competitive position to a third party
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • s.13(1) federal-provincial affairs: Exemption upheld for some information
  • s.13(2) discretion: Discretion not reasonably exercised
  • s.19(1) personal information: Exemption upheld for some information
  • s.20(1)(b) confidential third-party: Exemption not established
  • s.20(1)(c) financial information: Exemption not established
  • Disclosure of records: Disclosure ordered for some information
  • Compliance with order: Institution agreed to comply
Outcome

Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered

Reasoning

Health Canada failed to establish the applicability of sections 20(1)(b) and 20(1)(c), and did not reasonably exercise its discretion under section 13(2) for publicly available information, despite correctly applying sections 13(1) and 19(1) to other parts of the record.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Minister of Health is ordered to disclose the information in full, except where properly withheld under subsection 13(1) or subsection 19(1), and to re-exercise discretion under paragraph 13(2)(b) for information made public by the EMA.

Statutes considered
  • s.13(1) ATIA
  • s.13(2) ATIA
  • s.19(1) ATIA
  • s.19(2) ATIA
  • s.20(1)(b) ATIA
  • s.20(1)(c) ATIA
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro