Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

Privy Council Office (Re), 2026 OIC 34

Organization: Privy Council OfficeComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that the Privy Council Office (PCO) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to a previous access request (A-2012-00683) and a 10-page "Lessons Learned" document. The OIC found that PCO did not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that a reasonable search had been conducted, particularly regarding a second search by its Records Operations unit for which details were lacking. The Commissioner concluded that PCO did not conduct a reasonable search. Consequently, the complaint was deemed well founded, and PCO was ordered to conduct a new search, process any additional records found, and provide a supplementary response to the complainant within 36 business days. PCO did not indicate whether it would comply with the order.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the institution conducted a reasonable search for records
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Adequacy of search: Search found unreasonable
  • Complaint status: Complaint well founded
  • Remedy: New search ordered
Outcome

Complaint well founded — new search and disclosure ordered

Reasoning

The Privy Council Office failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that it conducted a reasonable search for responsive records, specifically lacking documentation for a second search conducted by its Records Operations unit.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Clerk of the Privy Council was ordered to conduct a new search for additional records, process all additional pages located, and provide a supplementary response to the access request no later than 36 business days following the date of the final report.

Statutes considered
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro