
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada Re), 2026 OIC 20
The complainant alleged that Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) failed to respond to an access request within the extended timeframe, constituting a deemed refusal under subsection 10(3) of the Access to Information Act. The request sought records related to parliamentary consideration of electric vehicle battery manufacturing facilities, agreements between manufacturers and the Government of Canada, and the use of foreign workers in these facilities. ISED had extended the response deadline by 300 days, but failed to meet it, primarily due to a lack of responsiveness from its Industry Sector. The Commissioner found the delay unacceptable and noted that the complainant had been waiting almost 18 months for a response. The Commissioner ordered ISED to provide a complete response within 60 business days of the final report. ISED indicated its intention to comply with the order, and the complaint was found to be well founded.
- 1Whether the institution responded within the extended time limits under subsection 9(1) of the Access to Information Act
- 2Whether the institution is deemed to have refused access under subsection 10(3) of the Access to Information Act
- Timeliness / deemed refusal: Deemed refusal upheld
- Compliance order: ISED ordered to respond within 60 business days
- Complaint finding: Complaint well founded
Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered
ISED failed to respond to the access request by the extended deadline of July 16, 2025, leading to a deemed refusal under subsection 10(3) of the Act. The delay was attributed to the unacceptable lack of responsiveness from the Industry Sector within ISED, which had not provided records to the ATIP unit.
The Minister of Industry is ordered to provide a complete response to the access request no later than 60 business days following the date of the final report.
- s.7 ATIA
- s.9(1) ATIA
- s.10(3) ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro