
Health Canada (Re), 2026 OIC 15
The complainant alleged that Health Canada improperly withheld information under paragraphs 20(1)(b) and 20(1)(c) of the Access to Information Act, related to submissions for using Anafranil / Altius Clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. During the investigation, the complainant narrowed the scope of the complaint to specific pages and no longer pursued the personal information exemption. Both Health Canada and the third party, AA Pharma Inc., declined to provide detailed representations to support the exemptions, stating that due to the passage of time, the exemptions no longer applied. The Information Commissioner found that the institution and third party failed to demonstrate that the exemptions were still applicable. Consequently, the Commissioner ordered Health Canada to disclose the information. Health Canada notified the Commissioner of its intent to comply with the order.
- 1Whether the information met the requirements of s.20(1)(a) ATIA (third-party trade secrets)
- 2Whether the information met the requirements of s.20(1)(b) ATIA (confidential third-party financial, commercial, scientific or technical information)
- 3Whether the information met the requirements of s.20(1)(c) ATIA (financial impact on a third party)
- s.20(1)(b) third-party info: Exemption not upheld
- s.20(1)(c) third-party info: Exemption not upheld
- Disclosure of records: Records ordered disclosed
Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered
Health Canada and the third party, AA Pharma Inc., failed to provide sufficient representations to justify the application of the exemptions under paragraphs 20(1)(a), 20(1)(b), and 20(1)(c), particularly acknowledging that the passage of time rendered the exemptions no longer applicable.
The Minister of Health is ordered to fully disclose pages 13-26, apart from any personal information contained therein.
- s.20(1)(b) ATIA
- s.20(1)(c) ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
- s.35(2)(c) ATIA
- s.37(2) ATIA
- s.43 ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro