
Health Canada (Re), 2026 OIC 15
The complainant alleged that Health Canada improperly withheld information related to submissions for using Anafranil / Altius Clomipramine in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder, citing exemptions related to third-party financial, commercial, scientific, or technical information. Both Health Canada and the third party indicated that due to the passage of time, the exemptions no longer applied. The Information Commissioner found the complaint well-founded and ordered Health Canada to disclose the withheld information, which the institution agreed to do.
- Whether information was properly withheld under paragraphs 20(1)(b) and 20(1)(c) of the Access to Information Act.
- Whether the passage of time rendered the claimed exemptions inapplicable.
- The burden on institutions and third parties to justify exemptions.
- The need for a clear and direct connection between disclosure and expected harm to justify exemption under paragraph 20(1)(c).
Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered
The Commissioner found the complaint well-founded because both Health Canada and the third party conceded that the exemptions claimed no longer applied due to the passage of time, and their representations were insufficient to justify the withholding of the information.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
The Minister of Health was ordered to fully disclose pages 13-26, apart from any personal information contained therein.
- s.20(1)(b) ATIA
- s.20(1)(c) ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
- s.36.1 ATIA
This is an informational summary only and does not constitute legal advice.

