Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

5822-07254 — Library and Archives Canada

Organization: Library and Archives CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that Library and Archives Canada (LAC) improperly withheld information under subsections 13(1) and 15(1) of the Access to Information Act, concerning Joint Intelligence Committee Intelligence for NORAD records from 1958-63. During the investigation, LAC provided two supplementary releases of previously withheld information. The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) determined that NORAD qualifies as an international organization of states for the purposes of paragraph 13(1)(b). The OIC found that not all information initially exempted by LAC met the requirements of subsections 13(1) and 15(1), leading to a well-founded complaint. However, an order was deemed unnecessary because LAC had already released some information, and the remaining withheld information was found to properly meet the requirements of subsection 13(1).

Key issues
  1. 1Whether information was properly withheld under s.13(1) ATIA
  2. 2Whether NORAD constitutes an international organization of states or an institution thereof for the purposes of s.13(1)(b) ATIA
  3. 3Whether information was obtained in confidence from a foreign state under s.13(1)(a) ATIA
  4. 4Whether information was obtained in confidence from an international organization of states under s.13(1)(b) ATIA
  5. 5Whether the institution reasonably exercised its discretion under s.13(2) ATIA
  6. 6Whether the circumstances in s.13(2) ATIA existed (consent or public availability)
  7. 7Whether information was properly withheld under s.15(1) ATIA
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • s.13(1) international affairs: Exemption not fully justified
  • s.15(1) international affairs: Exemption not fully justified
  • Definition of international organization: NORAD qualifies as international organization
  • Disclosure of records: Supplementary release provided
  • Complaint outcome: Complaint well-founded
  • Order for disclosure: Order deemed unnecessary
  • Remaining withheld information: Exemption s.13(1) upheld
Outcome

Complaint well founded, but no order issued

Reasoning

The complaint was well founded because Library and Archives Canada initially exempted information that did not meet the requirements of subsections 13(1) and 15(1). However, an order was not necessary as LAC subsequently released some of the previously exempted information, and the remaining withheld information was found to properly fall under subsection 13(1). The OIC concluded that NORAD is an international organization of states for the purpose of s.13(1)(b) and that the information was obtained in confidence.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.13(1) ATIA
  • s.13(1)(a) ATIA
  • s.13(1)(b) ATIA
  • s.13(2) ATIA
  • s.15(1) ATIA
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro