
5824-03837 — Health Canada
The complainant alleged that Health Canada failed to respond to an access request within the statutory time limits. The request sought records from specific dates related to parliamentary proceedings concerning the Public Health Agency of Canada and the National Microbiology Laboratory. Health Canada received the request and extended the response period by 210 days, but failed to respond by the extended deadline, leading to a deemed refusal under subsection 10(3) of the Act. The investigation revealed that Health Canada had completed processing the request but then put the response on hold, citing ongoing investigations into the National Microbiology Laboratory incident. The Information Commissioner found that the Act does not authorize an institution to 'pause' a response pending an investigation, emphasizing that concerns about sensitive information should be addressed through the timely application of exemptions. Although the Commissioner initially intended to order a response, Health Canada subsequently provided one, rendering the order unnecessary. The complaint was found to be well founded.
- 1Whether Health Canada responded to the access request within the statutory time limits or extended period
- 2Whether Health Canada's decision to 'pause' the response to an access request pending an investigation is authorized under the Access to Information Act
- 3Whether a deemed refusal occurred under subsection 10(3) of the Act
- Timeliness / deemed refusal: Deemed refusal upheld
- Institutional practice: Pausing response not authorized
- Complaint outcome: Complaint well founded
Complaint well founded — institution subsequently provided a response
Health Canada failed to respond to the access request within the statutory time limits, resulting in a deemed refusal. The institution's practice of 'pausing' a response due to ongoing investigations is not authorized by the Access to Information Act, which requires timely application of exemptions for sensitive information.
Health Canada was advised to provide a complete response to the access request, which it subsequently did.
- s.7 ATIA
- s.9(1)(a) ATIA
- s.9(1)(b) ATIA
- s.10(3) ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
- s.4(2.1) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro