Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

5819-05773 — Public Services and Procurement Canada

Organization: Public Services and Procurement CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) improperly withheld 96,781 pages of records under section 23 (solicitor-client and litigation privilege) of the Access to Information Act. The records related to the negotiation of a 1991 lease for the Louis St-Laurent Building. PSPC applied section 23 in a blanket manner, claiming both solicitor-client and litigation privilege. The Information Commissioner found that while some information met the requirements for solicitor-client privilege, PSPC failed to demonstrate that any information met the requirements for litigation privilege. Furthermore, PSPC's exercise of discretion was deemed unreasonable as it considered irrelevant factors and failed to consider relevant ones. The Commissioner also concluded that PSPC failed to adhere to section 25 by not performing a proper severance exercise. The complaint was found to be well founded, and PSPC was ordered to disclose specific types of records, all records not meeting solicitor-client privilege, and to reconsider its discretion for information genuinely subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the information met the requirements for solicitor-client privilege under s.23 ATIA
  2. 2Whether the information met the requirements for litigation privilege under s.23 ATIA
  3. 3Whether PSPC reasonably exercised its discretion to withhold information under s.23 ATIA
  4. 4Whether PSPC adhered to its severance obligations under s.25 ATIA
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • Solicitor-client privilege: Exemption partially upheld
  • Litigation privilege: Exemption not upheld
  • Exercise of discretion: Unreasonable exercise of discretion
  • Severance (s.25): Failure to perform proper severance
  • Disclosure of records: Specific records ordered disclosed
  • Reconsideration of discretion: Reconsideration ordered for solicitor-client privileged information
Outcome

Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered and discretion reconsideration ordered

Reasoning

The Commissioner found that PSPC failed to justify the application of litigation privilege to any records, did not reasonably exercise its discretion, and failed to properly sever non-exempt information. While some information met the criteria for solicitor-client privilege, the blanket application was not justified.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Minister of Public Works and Government Services is ordered to disclose specific types of records, all records not meeting solicitor-client privilege, and to reconsider discretion under section 23 for information that meets solicitor-client privilege requirements.

Statutes considered
  • s.23 ATIA
  • s.25 ATIA
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro