
Canada Border Services Agency (Re), 2024 OIC 43
The complainant alleged that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) improperly withheld the complete source code for the ArriveCAN application under subsection 16(2) of the Access to Information Act. CBSA argued that disclosing the source code could reasonably be expected to facilitate the commission of an offence by allowing malicious actors to hack the application, impersonate it, or expose security vulnerabilities, thereby risking personal information. The OIC found that at the time of the request in September 2022, when ArriveCAN was mandatory and collected sensitive personal data, the disclosure of the source code could indeed facilitate an offence. The Commissioner also concluded that CBSA reasonably exercised its discretion by weighing the public interest in disclosure against the risks. Furthermore, the OIC accepted CBSA's argument that severance of the source code was not reasonable due to the unknown locations of potential vulnerabilities. Consequently, the complaint was deemed not well founded.
- 1Whether disclosure of the ArriveCAN source code could reasonably be expected to facilitate the commission of an offence under s.16(2) ATIA
- 2Whether CBSA reasonably exercised its discretion in deciding not to disclose the information under s.16(2) ATIA
- 3Whether severance of the source code was reasonable under s.25 ATIA
- Application of s.16(2): Exemption upheld
- Exercise of discretion: Discretion reasonably exercised
- Severance: Severance not reasonable
- Complaint outcome: Complaint not well founded
Complaint not well founded
The Commissioner found that CBSA demonstrated a reasonable expectation of harm if the ArriveCAN source code were disclosed, meeting the requirements of s.16(2). CBSA also reasonably exercised its discretion by considering relevant factors, and severance was deemed impractical.
- s.16(2) ATIA
- s.25 ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro