Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActNot well-founded

5823-02494 — Canada Border Services Agency

Organization: Canada Border Services AgencyComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records in response to an access request for emails, text messages, and briefing notes related to companies working on the ArriveCAN application. The complainant specifically questioned the absence of text messages in the records provided. The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) investigated CBSA's search efforts, including the program areas involved, search parameters, and policies regarding text message management. CBSA explained that text messages are often considered transitory, especially if followed by an email, and that employees are responsible for saving non-transitory messages to a corporate repository. The OIC found that the Offices of Primary Interest conducted searches in appropriate repositories and that it was reasonable to believe that relevant text messages either did not exist or were not considered relevant at the time of the request, in line with CBSA and Treasury Board Secretariat policies. Consequently, the Information Commissioner concluded that CBSA conducted a reasonable search.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the Canada Border Services Agency conducted a reasonable search for records
  2. 2Whether text messages related to the ArriveCAN application existed and should have been provided
  3. 3Whether CBSA's information management policies regarding text messages were appropriately applied
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Adequacy of search: Search found to be reasonable
  • Text messages: No relevant text messages found
Outcome

Complaint not well founded

Reasoning

The Information Commissioner found that CBSA's Offices of Primary Interest conducted searches in appropriate repositories and that, based on CBSA and Treasury Board Secretariat policies, it was reasonable to believe that relevant text messages either did not exist or were not considered relevant at the time of the request.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro