Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

5823-02552 — National Defence

Organization: National DefenceComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that National Defence (DND) failed to respond to an access request within the 30-day statutory period for all documents relating to the course of action of Operation Aegis. The OIC found that DND received the request on September 1, 2023, and did not extend the response period or transfer the request, making the deadline October 1, 2023. DND failed to respond by this date, leading to a deemed refusal under subsection 10(3) of the Act. The investigation revealed that delays were primarily due to the Canadian Forces Intelligence Command (CFINTCOM), one of DND's Offices of Primary Interest (OPIs), which had not yet provided all responsive records to the Departmental Access to Information and Privacy (DAIP) office. The Commissioner deemed CFINTCOM's delay unacceptable and emphasized the collective responsibility of the institution to ensure timely access to information. The complaint was found to be well-founded, and DND was ordered to provide a complete response within 60 business days.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether National Defence responded to the access request within the 30-day period set out in section 7 of the Access to Information Act
  2. 2Whether National Defence validly extended the 30-day period under section 9 of the Access to Information Act
  3. 3Whether National Defence is deemed to have refused access to the requested records under subsection 10(3) of the Access to Information Act
  4. 4Whether the delay by the Office of Primary Interest (Canadian Forces Intelligence Command) in retrieving records was acceptable
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Timeliness / deemed refusal: Deemed refusal upheld
  • Institutional responsibility: OPI delay deemed unacceptable
  • Disclosure of records: Records ordered disclosed
Outcome

Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered

Reasoning

National Defence failed to respond to the access request within the statutory 30-day period and did not validly extend this period, resulting in a deemed refusal. The delay was attributed to an Office of Primary Interest (Canadian Forces Intelligence Command) not providing responsive records in a timely manner.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Minister of National Defence is ordered to provide a complete response to the access request no later than the 60th business day following the date of the final report. The Commissioner also recommended developing proper processes and procedures for OPIs to provide records in a timely fashion and establishing performance indicators to hold senior officials accountable for delays.

Statutes considered
  • s.7 ATIA
  • s.9 ATIA
  • s.10(3) ATIA
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro