Library and Archives Canada (Re), 2024 OIC 12
The complainant alleged that Library and Archives Canada (LAC) took an unreasonably long extension of time to respond to a request for RCMP records concerning Project Anecdote. LAC claimed an extension of over 65 years, citing the large volume of records (780,000 pages) requiring digitization and review, as well as consultations. The Information Commissioner found that LAC failed to demonstrate the reasonableness of the extension, as it did not justify the calculation method, the sole reliance on one employee, or the concurrent nature of tasks. Therefore, the extension was deemed invalid and LAC was considered to have refused access.
- Reasonableness of time extension under subsection 9(1)(a) due to volume of records
- Reasonableness of time extension under subsection 9(1)(b) due to consultations
- Calculation of extension based on specific tasks and resources
- LAC's failure to demonstrate that the extension was for the shortest possible duration
Complaint well founded — extension of time invalid, deemed refusal
The Information Commissioner found that Library and Archives Canada did not adequately demonstrate that the 65-year extension of time was reasonable. LAC failed to justify the calculation of the extension, particularly the assumption of a single employee working consecutively on tasks, and did not provide sufficient detail on the consultations needed.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Library and Archives Canada was ordered to provide a complete response to the access request forthwith, provide updates to the complainant every six months, and endeavour to provide interim releases.
- section 9(1) ATIA
- paragraph 30(1)(c) ATIA
- subsection 10(3) ATIA
This is an informational summary and not legal advice.