
5822-01137 — Health Canada
The complainant alleged that Health Canada improperly withheld information under paragraphs 20(1)(b) and 20(1)(c) of the Access to Information Act. The request sought records related to an Abbreviated New Drug Submission (ANDS) for the medicinal ingredient "tacrolimus." Specifically, the complaint focused on the dates of correspondence between a third party and Health Canada, which were withheld concurrently under both exemptions. The Commissioner found that the dates did not constitute "commercial" information as required by paragraph 20(1)(b), citing Supreme Court jurisprudence that administrative details like dates are not typically commercial. Regarding paragraph 20(1)(c), the Commissioner determined that neither Health Canada nor the third party provided convincing evidence that disclosing these specific dates would lead to a reasonable expectation of material financial harm or competitive prejudice. The evidence presented was deemed too speculative. Consequently, the Commissioner concluded that neither exemption applied and ordered Health Canada to disclose the dates.
- 1Whether the dates of correspondence constitute "financial, commercial, scientific or technical information" under s.20(1)(b) ATIA
- 2Whether the information is confidential under s.20(1)(b) ATIA
- 3Whether the third party consistently treated the information as confidential under s.20(1)(b) ATIA
- 4Whether disclosure of the dates could reasonably be expected to result in material financial loss or gain to the third party under s.20(1)(c) ATIA
- 5Whether there is a reasonable expectation of harm occurring under s.20(1)(c) ATIA
- s.20(1)(b) commercial info: Exemption not applicable
- s.20(1)(c) financial harm: Exemption not applicable
- Disclosure of records: Records ordered disclosed
Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered
The Commissioner found that the withheld dates did not meet the criteria for either exemption. The dates were not considered "commercial" information under s.20(1)(b), and the institution and third party failed to demonstrate a reasonable expectation of financial harm or competitive prejudice under s.20(1)(c).
The Minister of Health is ordered to disclose the dates within the records.
- s.20(1)(b) ATIA
- s.20(1)(c) ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
- s.35 ATIA
- s.36.1(1) ATIA
- s.36.3(1) ATIA
- s.43 ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro