
Notice under subsection 30(5), 2023 OIC 40
The Information Commissioner of Canada gave notice that she ceased investigating seventeen complaints. The complainant alleged that an institution's time extensions on seventeen access requests were unreasonable. However, the Commissioner found the requests were vexatious and substantively duplicative of a previous request where the institution's time extension was deemed reasonable. The Commissioner also noted the institution was providing interim responses as committed, and the complainant's actions suggested an attempt to circumvent previous findings.
- Whether the complaints were vexatious
- Whether further investigation was unnecessary
- Whether the requests were duplicative of a previous request
- Whether the complainant was attempting to circumvent previous findings
Investigation discontinued
The Commissioner found the complaints vexatious and unnecessary to investigate further, as they were substantively duplicative of a previous complaint and appeared to be an attempt to circumvent the OIC's prior findings, rather than using the available court review mechanism.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
- s.30(5) ATIA
- s.30(4)(a) ATIA
- s.30(4)(b) ATIA
- s.41(1) ATIA
This is an informational summary and not legal advice.

