Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

Library and Archives Canada (Re), 2023 OIC 18

Organization: Library and Archives CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that Library and Archives Canada (LAC) improperly withheld information under subsections 13(1) and 15(1) of the Access to Information Act concerning submarine operations in the Arctic. LAC initially released some information but maintained that the remaining records were justifiably withheld. The Information Commissioner found that LAC failed to demonstrate that the information was obtained in confidence, as required by subsection 13(1), lacking evidence of an expectation of confidentiality. Furthermore, the Commissioner determined that LAC did not provide convincing evidence that the disclosure of the information, much of which was historical and publicly available, could reasonably be expected to harm national security or defence, as required by subsection 15(1). Consequently, the Commissioner concluded that the complaint was well founded and recommended full disclosure. However, LAC notified the Commissioner that it would not implement the recommendation.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the information was obtained in confidence from a specified government body under s.13(1) ATIA
  2. 2Whether there was a reasonable expectation of harm to national security or defence from disclosure under s.15(1) ATIA
  3. 3Whether the institution reasonably exercised its discretion under s.13(2) ATIA
  4. 4Whether the institution reasonably exercised its discretion under s.15(1) ATIA
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • s.13(1) confidential information: Exemption not justified
  • s.15(1) national security: Exemption not justified
  • Disclosure of records: Full disclosure recommended
  • Complaint outcome: Well founded
  • Implementation of recommendation: Institution refused to implement
Outcome

Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered, but institution refused to comply

Reasoning

LAC failed to provide sufficient evidence to meet the requirements of both subsection 13(1) regarding information obtained in confidence and subsection 15(1) regarding the reasonable expectation of harm to national security or defence. The Commissioner found the claim of harm under s.15(1) to be speculative, given the age of the records and the public availability of related information.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Information Commissioner recommended that Library and Archives Canada disclose the responsive records in their entirety.

Statutes considered
  • s.13(1) ATIA
  • s.15(1) ATIA
  • s.30(1)(a) ATIA
  • s.37(4) ATIA
  • s.43 ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro