
3216-01562 — Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada
The complainant alleged that Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC) had improperly withheld records related to land ownership and transactions on the Bruce/Saugeen Peninsula under section 23 (solicitor-client and litigation privilege). CIRNAC initially claimed solicitor-client privilege but later conceded this did not apply. The institution then argued litigation privilege, citing ongoing court cases. However, the Commissioner found CIRNAC failed to demonstrate that the records were created for the dominant purpose of litigation. The Commissioner recommended full disclosure, but CIRNAC refused to implement the recommendation.
- Applicability of section 23 (solicitor-client privilege)
- Applicability of section 23 (litigation privilege)
- Dominant purpose test for litigation privilege
- Institution's discretion to exercise privilege claims
Complaint well founded — disclosure recommended
The Commissioner found that CIRNAC failed to establish that the records were subject to either solicitor-client privilege or litigation privilege, as the institution did not demonstrate they were created for the dominant purpose of litigation.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
The Commissioner recommended that the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations disclose the records in their entirety.
- s.23 ATIA
- s.19 ATIA
- s.20 ATIA
This is a summary of a decision for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

