BreachOfPrivacy
Decisions/Federal (Canada)/Access to Information Act/3216-01562 — Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada
Office of the Information Commissioner of CanadaAccess to Information Act3216-01562Well-founded
Flag of Canada

3216-01562 — Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada

Organization: Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada
Decision: Jun 14, 2023Published: Jun 14, 2023

The complainant alleged that Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC) had improperly withheld records related to land ownership and transactions on the Bruce/Saugeen Peninsula under section 23 (solicitor-client and litigation privilege). CIRNAC initially claimed solicitor-client privilege but later conceded this did not apply. The institution then argued litigation privilege, citing ongoing court cases. However, the Commissioner found CIRNAC failed to demonstrate that the records were created for the dominant purpose of litigation. The Commissioner recommended full disclosure, but CIRNAC refused to implement the recommendation.

  • Applicability of section 23 (solicitor-client privilege)
  • Applicability of section 23 (litigation privilege)
  • Dominant purpose test for litigation privilege
  • Institution's discretion to exercise privilege claims

Complaint well founded — disclosure recommended

The Commissioner found that CIRNAC failed to establish that the records were subject to either solicitor-client privilege or litigation privilege, as the institution did not demonstrate they were created for the dominant purpose of litigation.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗

Recommended action / remedy

The Commissioner recommended that the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations disclose the records in their entirety.

Statutory provisions cited
  • s.23 ATIA
  • s.19 ATIA
  • s.20 ATIA

This is a summary of a decision for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.