
3216-01562 — Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada
The complainant alleged that Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC) improperly withheld records under section 23 (solicitor-client and litigation privilege) of the Access to Information Act. The request sought records from the 1850s to 1980 related to land ownership, sale, reversion, or return on the Bruce/Saugeen Peninsula. CIRNAC initially claimed solicitor-client privilege but later conceded it did not apply, then reversed course to maintain section 23 based on litigation privilege, citing ongoing court cases. The Information Commissioner found that CIRNAC failed to establish that the records were subject to litigation privilege, specifically that they were produced or gathered for the dominant purpose of the cited litigation. The Commissioner recommended full disclosure of the records. CIRNAC refused to implement the recommendation, asserting the information remained protected by litigation privilege. The complaint was found to be well founded.
- 1Whether the records were subject to solicitor-client privilege under s.23 ATIA
- 2Whether the records were subject to litigation privilege under s.23 ATIA
- 3Whether the records were produced or gathered for the dominant purpose of litigation
- Application of s.23: Litigation privilege not established
- Disclosure of records: Full disclosure recommended
- Complaint outcome: Complaint well founded
Complaint well founded — disclosure recommended, but institution refused to comply
CIRNAC failed to demonstrate that the records met the requirements for either solicitor-client or litigation privilege under section 23. Specifically, the institution did not show that the records were produced or gathered for the dominant purpose of the cited litigation.
The Commissioner recommended that the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations disclose the records in their entirety.
- s.23 ATIA
- s.19(1) ATIA
- s.20(1) ATIA
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
- s.43 ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro