Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActDiscontinued

Decision under section 31, 2022 OIC 53

Organization: A federal institutionComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) received a complaint alleging that a federal institution failed to respond within an extended timeframe for an access request and engaged in inappropriate communication. The OIC accepted the complaint regarding the delay but deemed the complaint about inappropriate communication inadmissible. The institution had, on May 2, 2022, suggested the requester abandon their request, which the requester declined on May 22, 2022. The complainant argued the 60-day period for filing a complaint about the communication started when the extended response timeframe expired on August 25, 2022. However, the OIC determined that the alleged inappropriate conduct occurred on May 2, 2022, when the institution first communicated its proposal regarding the request. Since the complaint about communication was filed after the mandatory 60-day limit from May 2, 2022, the Commissioner found it inadmissible.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the institution responded within the extended timeframe for an access request
  2. 2Whether the complaint regarding the institution's alleged inappropriate communication was submitted within the 60-day time limit under s.31 ATIA
  3. 3When the complainant became aware of the grounds for complaint regarding alleged inappropriate communication
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • Timeliness of response: Complaint accepted for investigation
  • Inappropriate communication: Complaint deemed inadmissible
  • Complaint filing deadline: Deadline for communication complaint not met
Outcome

Complaint regarding inappropriate communication inadmissible; complaint regarding delay accepted for investigation

Reasoning

The complaint regarding the institution's alleged inappropriate communication was submitted after the mandatory 60-day time limit stipulated in section 31 of the Access to Information Act. The Commissioner determined that the 60-day period began on May 2, 2022, when the alleged inappropriate communication occurred, not on the later date the complainant suggested.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.31 ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro