
Decision under section 31, 2022 OIC 48
The complainant filed a complaint with the Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) regarding an access request. The institution had responded to the access request by email, but the complainant inadvertently deleted the email before reviewing its contents. The complainant argued that the 60-day time limit for filing a complaint under section 31 of the Access to Information Act (ATIA) should begin from the date they became aware of the grounds for complaint, which was when they recovered and reviewed the deleted email. The OIC determined that the complaint was inadmissible because it was submitted outside the mandatory 60-day timeframe. The Commissioner clarified that the 60-day period begins the day after the requester receives the institution's response, not when they become aware of the grounds for complaint due to their own actions. The OIC concluded that the ATIA does not grant the Commissioner the power to extend this statutory time limit.
- 1Whether the complaint was filed within the 60-day time limit prescribed by section 31 of the ATIA
- 2Interpretation of 'in any other case' in section 31 of the ATIA regarding the start of the complaint period
- 3Whether the Information Commissioner has the power to extend the 60-day time limit for filing a complaint
- Complaint admissibility: Complaint inadmissible due to late filing
- Complaint time limit: 60-day period starts from receipt of response
- Extension of time limit: Commissioner lacks power to extend statutory time limit
Complaint inadmissible
The complaint was inadmissible because it was submitted outside the mandatory 60-day timeframe stipulated in section 31 of the ATIA. The Commissioner determined that the 60-day period begins the day after the requester receives the institution's response, and the Act does not allow for an extension of this time limit.
- s.31 ATIA
- s.7 ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro