Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

5819-02244 — Export Development Canada

Organization: Export Development CanadaComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant alleged that Export Development Canada (EDC) improperly withheld information related to financial assistance provided to Canadian companies in Honduras. The request sought a summary of all financial assistance over $50,000 from 2009 to 2019. EDC claimed exemptions under subsections 18.1(1) (confidential financial, commercial, scientific or technical information of EDC) and 24(1) (disclosure restricted by another law) of the Access to Information Act. The Information Commissioner found that EDC failed to demonstrate that the information "belonged to" it for the purpose of s.18.1(1), as it was shared with and retained by customers. For s.24(1), EDC invoked section 24.3 of the Export Development Act, but the Commissioner determined that the information was "created" by EDC, not "obtained" by it, thus falling outside the scope of the exemption. The Commissioner ordered EDC to disclose policy types, policy numbers, and maximum liability amounts. EDC partially implemented the order, disclosing only policy types, and indicated its intention to seek a Federal Court review regarding the interpretation of the Export Development Act.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the information "belongs to" EDC for the purpose of s.18.1(1) ATIA
  2. 2Whether EDC consistently treated the information as confidential for the purpose of s.18.1(1) ATIA
  3. 3Whether the information was "obtained by" EDC or "created by" EDC for the purpose of s.24.3(1) of the Export Development Act
  4. 4Whether the information falls under s.24(1) ATIA due to s.24.3(1) of the Export Development Act
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • s.18.1(1) exemption: Exemption not upheld
  • s.24(1) exemption: Exemption not upheld
  • Disclosure of records: Partial disclosure ordered
  • Compliance with order: Partial compliance by institution
  • Federal Court review: Institution intends to seek review
Outcome

Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered (partially implemented)

Reasoning

EDC failed to demonstrate that the information met the requirements of either s.18.1(1) or s.24(1) of the ATIA. Specifically, the information did not exclusively "belong to" EDC and was not consistently treated as confidential under s.18.1(1). Furthermore, the information was "created" by EDC, not "obtained" by it, thus not falling under the scope of s.24.3(1) of the Export Development Act as required for s.24(1) ATIA.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Information Commissioner ordered Export Development Canada to disclose the policy types (acronyms), policy numbers, and maximum liability amounts that had been withheld.

Statutes considered
  • s.18.1(1) ATIA
  • s.24(1) ATIA
  • s.24.3(1) Export Development Act

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro