
Office of the Auditor General of Canada (Re), 2022 OIC 40
The complainant alleged that the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (OAG) improperly determined that witness statements and documentation supporting a harassment investigation final report were not under its control, thus denying access. The OIC investigated whether the records, though not in the OAG's physical possession, were under its control according to the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Access to Information Act. The OIC considered several factors, including whether the records related to an institutional matter, if the OAG had a legally enforceable right to access them, and if communication of their content required OAG authorization. The OIC found that the records were indeed under the OAG's control. Consequently, the OAG retrieved and processed the records, issuing an interim release to the complainant, who expressed satisfaction. The complaint was found to be well founded.
- 1Whether records not in physical possession of the institution are under its control
- 2Whether the records relate to an institutional matter
- 3Whether the institution has a legally enforceable right of access to the records
- 4Whether the communication of the content of the records requires the authorization of an officer or employee of an institution
- 5Whether the institution relied on the records when preparing other government records
- 6Whether a senior official of the institution should reasonably expect to obtain a copy of the records upon request
- Control of records: Records found to be under institution's control
- Access to records: Records processed and released
- Complaint outcome: Complaint well founded
Complaint well founded
The OIC concluded that the records were under the control of the Office of the Auditor General of Canada based on a multi-factor analysis, including the OAG's legally enforceable right to access the records and the requirement for OAG authorization for their communication. The OAG ultimately conceded control and released the records.
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro