
3215-00664 — Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Department of Justice
The complainant alleged that the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) failed to conduct a reasonable search for records related to pay equity for unionized CSIS employees. The request sought communications between CSIS and other federal government departments and agencies on this topic. CSIS initially searched its Human Resource Compensation Branch but refused to search its Departmental Legal Services Unit (DLSU), arguing that DLSU records were under the control of the Department of Justice, not CSIS. The Office of the Information Commissioner found that CSIS's refusal to task its DLSU was premature and that records physically located with the DLSU could still be under CSIS's control, especially given the solicitor-client relationship and the subject matter relating directly to CSIS's mandate. The Commissioner concluded that CSIS failed to conduct a reasonable search by not retrieving and reviewing these records to determine control. The complaint was found to be well founded, and the Commissioner recommended that CSIS retrieve, review, and respond to the records from its DLSU, but CSIS declined to implement the recommendations.
- 1Whether CSIS conducted a reasonable search for records
- 2Whether records physically located with CSIS's Departmental Legal Services Unit (DLSU) are under the control of CSIS
- 3Whether CSIS's refusal to task its DLSU for records constitutes a failure to conduct a reasonable search
- Reasonable search: Search found unreasonable due to exclusion of DLSU records
- Control of records: DLSU records potentially under CSIS control
- Complaint outcome: Complaint well founded
- Recommendations implementation: CSIS declined to implement recommendations
Complaint well founded — CSIS declined to implement recommendations
CSIS failed to conduct a reasonable search by refusing to retrieve and review records from its Departmental Legal Services Unit (DLSU) to determine if they were under its control. The Commissioner found that records related to CSIS's mandate, even if physically held by the DLSU, could reasonably be considered under CSIS's control, especially given the solicitor-client relationship.
The Commissioner recommended that CSIS retrieve all responsive records from its DLSU, review them to determine control, and issue a new response to the complainant, providing access to any additional responsive records or citing specific exemptions. CSIS declined to implement these recommendations.
- s.30(1)(a) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro