Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

Library and Archives Canada (Re), 2022 OIC 17

Organization: Library and Archives CanadaComplainant: Information Commissioner of Canada
Plain-language brief

The Information Commissioner initiated a systemic investigation into Library and Archives Canada's (LAC) persistent delays in responding to access requests, prompted by a history of non-compliance with legislative deadlines. The investigation found that LAC failed to meet its obligation to provide timely access, with almost 80% of requests completed after the statutory deadlines in 2020-21. Key contributing factors identified were the backlog from suspending ATIP operations during the pandemic, problematic consultation practices with other institutions, inadequate infrastructure for processing classified records, the absence of a government-wide declassification program, and insufficient ATIP funding and resources. The Commissioner concluded the complaint was well-founded and issued ten recommendations to the Minister of Canadian Heritage to address these systemic issues. However, the Commissioner found the Minister's responses largely lacked urgency and concrete commitments, leading to concerns about the sufficiency of proposed measures. The Commissioner also tabled a special report to Parliament highlighting broader challenges in the access to information system.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether Library and Archives Canada (LAC) met its obligation to provide timely access to records under subsection 4(2.1) and section 7 of the ATIA
  2. 2Whether LAC's suspension of ATIP operations during the early months of the pandemic contributed to delays and non-compliance
  3. 3Whether LAC's practices regarding consultations with other institutions were consistent with paragraph 9(1)(b) of the ATIA and the Interim Directive
  4. 4Whether LAC's lack of adequate infrastructure for digitizing, reviewing, and consulting on Secret and Top Secret records contributed to processing delays
  5. 5Whether the absence of a mandatory government-wide declassification program contributed to delays in processing classified records
  6. 6Whether the lack of adequate funding for LAC's ATIP office to support new programs introduced by other institutions contributed to its inability to provide timely access
  7. 7Whether the ATIP and Litigation Response Division's large workload, vacant positions, and staff instability contributed to delays in responding to access requests
Outcome breakdownFavours: Applicant / complainant
  • Timeliness of response: Systemic delays found
  • Compliance with deadlines: Institution failed to meet obligations
  • Systemic issues: Complaint well-founded
  • Recommendations to Minister: Ten recommendations issued
  • Minister's response: Response lacked urgency and concrete commitments
Outcome

Complaint well founded

Reasoning

LAC failed to meet its obligation to provide timely access, with almost 80% of requests completed after legislative deadlines, due to systemic issues including pandemic-related backlog, problematic consultation practices, inadequate infrastructure for classified records, lack of a declassification program, and insufficient ATIP resources.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Commissioner made ten recommendations to the Minister of Canadian Heritage, including processing the backlog, improving consultation practices, implementing infrastructure for classified records, requiring declassification before transfer, and securing adequate ATIP funding.

Statutes considered
  • s.4(2.1) ATIA
  • s.7 ATIA
  • s.9(1)(b) ATIA
  • s.10(3) ATIA
  • s.37(2) ATIA
  • s.39(1) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro