Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActDiscontinued

Decision under section 31, 2022 OIC 11

Organization: A federal institutionComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The complainant filed a complaint with the Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) regarding an access request. The institution provided documentation showing that the complaint was submitted more than seven weeks after the 60-day statutory deadline set out in section 31 of the Access to Information Act. The complainant acknowledged the delay, explaining that the institution's response to their request had been "misplaced" after receipt, and asked the Commissioner to exercise "residual discretion" to extend the deadline. The Commissioner considered the complainant's representations and the documentary evidence. Citing Federal Court of Appeal jurisprudence, the Commissioner concluded that she does not have the authority to extend statutory timeframes for filing complaints. Therefore, the complaint was rejected as it did not meet the requirements of section 31.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the complaint was filed within the 60-day statutory timeframe under section 31 of the Access to Information Act
  2. 2Whether the Information Commissioner has the authority to extend the statutory timeframe for filing a complaint
Outcome breakdownFavours: Institution
  • Timeliness of complaint: Complaint rejected due to late filing
  • Jurisdiction to extend deadline: Commissioner lacks authority to extend statutory deadline
Outcome

Complaint rejected due to late filing

Reasoning

The complaint was filed outside the 60-day statutory timeframe stipulated in section 31 of the Access to Information Act, and the Information Commissioner lacks the authority to extend such timeframes, as confirmed by Federal Court of Appeal jurisprudence.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Statutes considered
  • s.31 ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro