
3217-00342 — Department of Justice Canada
The complainant requested information regarding legal fees for a specific litigation file from the Department of Justice Canada. The Department withheld expense details and disbursements under section 23 (legal advice and litigation privilege), citing solicitor-client privilege and a presumption of privilege for legal bills. The Information Commissioner found that while disbursements are generally presumed privileged, this presumption was rebutted in this case. The Commissioner concluded that the information was not subject to privilege as there was no reasonable possibility that it could be used to deduce protected communications, and recommended its disclosure. The Department of Justice Canada agreed to implement this recommendation.
- Whether section 23 (legal advice and litigation privilege) of the ATIA applied to the withheld expense details and disbursements.
- Whether the presumption of privilege for legal bills, as established in Maranda v. Richer, was rebutted.
- Whether the withheld information could be used by an assiduous inquirer to deduce privileged communications.
Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered
The Information Commissioner found that while the Department of Justice Canada correctly identified that disbursements are subject to a presumption of privilege, this presumption was rebutted in this specific case. The Commissioner determined that the withheld information was not significant enough that an inquirer could use it to deduce or acquire protected communications.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Disclose all information initially withheld pursuant to section 23 of the Act.
- s.23 ATIA
This is an informational summary only and does not constitute legal advice.

