
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (Re), 2021 OIC 8
The complainant alleged that Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) took an unreasonable extension of time to respond to an access request for information related to the Competition Bureau's bread price-fixing investigation. The request involved over 75 million pages of records. ISED calculated the extension by considering the volume of records, the time needed for the program area to gather records, and the time needed by the Access to Information and Privacy Office to analyze exemptions. The Information Commissioner found the complaint not well founded, agreeing that the extension was reasonable and that ISED followed the proper procedures.
- Whether the extension of time taken by the institution was reasonable under paragraph 9(1)(a) of the Access to Information Act.
- Whether the request involved a large number of records or required searching through a large number of records.
- Whether meeting the 30-day deadline would unreasonably interfere with the institution's operations.
- Whether the duration of the extension was reasonable given the circumstances.
Complaint not well founded
The Commissioner determined that the institution met all three requirements for claiming an extension of time under paragraph 9(1)(a) of the Access to Information Act. The request involved a vast number of records, responding within 30 days would have unreasonably interfered with the institution's operations, and the 1,460-day extension was found to be reasonable after considering the complexity of the records and the time required for processing.
AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
The OIC invited the institution to consider disclosing any completed packages of records to the complainant as they are completed.
- 9(1)(a) ATIA
This is an informational summary and not legal advice.

