
5820-00879 — Royal Canadian Mounted Police
The complainant alleged that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) improperly withheld information under paragraph 16(1)(a) of the Access to Information Act. The requested information pertained to a complaint investigated by the RCMP. The OIC's investigation determined that the withheld information was obtained by the RCMP, an investigative body specified in the regulations, during a lawful investigation related to the detection, prevention, or suppression of crime. Furthermore, the information was created less than twenty years before the request. The OIC also found that the RCMP reasonably exercised its discretion by considering relevant factors for and against disclosure, including the purpose of the Act and the private interests of other individuals. Consequently, the OIC concluded that the information met the requirements for exemption under paragraph 16(1)(a) and that the institution's decision to withhold it was appropriate.
- 1Whether the information was obtained or prepared by an investigative body listed in Schedule I of the Access to Information Regulations
- 2Whether the information was obtained or prepared during a lawful investigation within the authority of the investigative body
- 3Whether the investigation concerned the detection, prevention, or suppression of crime, enforcement of law, or threats to security of Canada
- 4Whether the information was created less than 20 years before the access request
- 5Whether the institution reasonably exercised its discretion to decide whether to release the information under s.16(1)(a)
- Application of s. 16(1)(a): Exemption upheld
- Discretionary exemption: Discretion properly exercised
Complaint not well founded
The OIC found that the withheld information met all the criteria for exemption under s.16(1)(a) ATIA, as it was prepared by the RCMP during a lawful investigation related to crime detection, prevention, or suppression, and was less than 20 years old. The OIC also concluded that the RCMP reasonably exercised its discretion in deciding to withhold the information.
- s.16(1)(a) ATIA
This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Related by meaning
Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable
Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.
Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).
Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.
Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.
Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.
Upgrade to Pro