Federal (Canada)Access to Information ActWell-founded

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (Re), 2020 OIC 2

Organization: Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceComplainant: Anonymous applicant
Plain-language brief

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) failed to respond to an access to information request for over two years, leading to a deemed refusal under the Access to Information Act. During the investigation, the RCMP provided insufficient information regarding the records or the processing of the request to establish a reasonable response date. Due to the continued lack of response, the Information Commissioner found the complaint to be well-founded. The Commissioner ordered the RCMP to respond to the access request within 10 business days from the effective date of the order. However, the RCMP ultimately responded to the request before the order officially came into effect.

Key issues
  1. 1Whether the institution failed to respond to an access request within the statutory time limits (deemed refusal)
  2. 2Whether the institution provided sufficient information to justify the delay
Outcome breakdownFavours: Both, in part
  • Timeliness / deemed refusal: Deemed refusal occurred
  • Institutional response: Insufficient information provided by institution
  • Complaint finding: Complaint well-founded
  • Order to respond: Institution ordered to respond within 10 days
  • Compliance with order: Institution responded before order effective
Outcome

Complaint well founded — disclosure ordered

Reasoning

The RCMP failed to respond to the access request for over two years, resulting in a deemed refusal. The institution also failed to provide adequate information during the investigation to explain the delay or to establish a new response date.

AI-generated summary for reference only. Always verify against the official decision ↗
Decision notes
Recommended action / remedy

The Commissioner ordered the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to respond to the access request within 10 business days from the day the order takes effect.

Statutes considered
  • s.10(3) ATIA

This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Pro · AI

Decisions with similar reasoning and facts — found by AI across statutes and jurisdictions, not just keywords.

Pro
Coverage — 13 of 14 jurisdictions searchable

Fully searchable: Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, New Brunswick, Manitoba.

Partial (recent decisions only): Federal (Canada) (651 of 1,631), Nova Scotia (49 of 472), Quebec (6 of 7,090), Prince Edward Island (2 of 279), Yukon (1 of 75).

Coming soon: Nunavut — being re-processed for AI search.

Find decisions like this one — by meaning, not keywords.

Related by meaning is a Pro feature. Upgrade to surface conceptually similar decisions across the corpus, powered by AI.

Upgrade to Pro